Imagine a prestigious honor meant to celebrate the crème de la crème of doctoral work—only for it to be handed out unfairly, leaving talented individuals overlooked simply because of their gender. That's the shocking reality behind Twente University's bold move to eliminate the "cum laude" distinction for PhD theses, as reported on DutchNews.nl. But here's where it gets controversial: is this a necessary step toward equality, or does it risk dumbing down academic excellence? Let's dive into the details and unpack what this means for the future of higher education.
On November 7, 2025, Twente University announced the removal of the "with distinction" award, commonly known as cum laude, from its doctoral regulations. This honor, which recognizes exceptional PhD theses, was deemed problematic because it's not grounded in clear, objective standards and has been systematically withheld from women. The university outlined this in an official regulation update, available at their website (https://www.utwente.nl/en/news-events/corporate-announcements/2025/11/667054/ut-updates-doctoral-regulations-greater-clarity-and-better-supervision#end-of-the-cum-laude-designation).
Tom Veldkamp, the dean at the university, explained that the choice stemmed from multiple academic studies, including a key 2023 paper from the University of Amsterdam. Researcher Thijs Bol analyzed over 5,000 instances where the thesis quality clearly deserved the cum laude accolade. His findings were eye-opening: women were twice as likely to be denied this recognition compared to men. And this is the part most people miss—the disparity widened significantly when the evaluation panels consisted entirely of male judges. For beginners wondering about this, cum laude literally translates to "with praise" in Latin, and in Dutch academia, it's a rare badge of honor awarded to only about 5% of all PhD graduates nationwide. Each university sets its own benchmarks for what qualifies as "scientific excellence," which can include groundbreaking research, innovative methodologies, or profound contributions to the field. However, this subjectivity opens the door to unconscious biases, like those favoring male candidates, which Bol's research highlights through concrete data.
To illustrate, think of a scenario in STEM fields where a female PhD candidate develops a novel algorithm that revolutionizes data analysis, yet her work gets passed over for a similar male-authored thesis due to subtle gender stereotypes in judging. This isn't just about fairness; it undermines the integrity of academic awards and discourages diverse voices in research. But wait—could abolishing cum laude altogether mean we're losing a motivator for top-tier work? Some might argue it simplifies things too much, potentially making all PhDs feel equally "elite" in a way that erodes motivation. What do you think? Is this a progressive fix to a biased system, or does it overlook the value of celebrating standout achievements?
We at DutchNews.nl appreciate your support in keeping our service free and accessible. Without the kind contributions from readers like you, we couldn't deliver daily summaries of the Netherlands' most pressing news stories. Your donations help us focus on topics that resonate with you and maintain our commitment to unbiased reporting. Consider making a donation today at (https://www.dutchnews.nl/donate-to-dutchnews-nl).
So, where do you stand on this? Does Twente University's decision signal a brighter, more equitable future for academia, or is it a step too far that might dilute the meaning of excellence? Share your thoughts in the comments below—we'd love to hear your take!
